State Interference With EDL Walthamstow Demonstration: A Violation of Freedom Of Assembly? – BPE Submission to OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting

By • on September 25, 2012

The following video is footage from the aborted EDL demonstration at Walthamstow, United Kingdom:

Protecting the right of freedom of assembly is a component of the 2012 Brussels Process which ICLA launched at a Conference in the European Parliament back in July 2012. Click the button below to sign The Brussels Declaration To Safeguard Individual Liberties And Human Rights.  Spread the word about The Brussels Process.

The following statement has been submitted by Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa for the OSCE Human Dimension Implementation meeting that takes place in Warsaw on 25 September 2012.  It is fully supported and endorsed by the International Civil Liberties Alliance:


OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting

Working Session 2

Freedom of Assembly and Association

Warsaw, September 25, 2012


Right to Peaceful Assembly – Only For Some?

Not only has Freedom of Assembly long been considered one of the most important rights possessed by the citizens of a democratic state, but this right has been reaffirmed over and over: by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Art. 20(1)), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Art. 21), the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Art. 11), the American Convention on Human Rights (Art. 15), and finally the OSCE Copenhagen Document, reaffirmed at its Paris Summit in 1990:

“We affirm that, without discrimination, every individual has the right to (…) freedom of association and peaceful assembly.” [highlight by BPE]

In light of the above, BPE would like to draw attention to the OSCE Guidelines to Freedom of Assembly which specify that “The state has a positive duty to actively protect peaceful assemblies.” Furthermore, the state is required to protect participants of a peaceful demonstration from any person or group that attempts to disrupt (…) it in any way.

While the German government and the German police forces are to be commended for allowing demonstrations and rallies to take place without hindrance [ref. Paper presented by ICLA – International Civil Liberties Alliance – to HDIM, Sept.29, 2009], BPE notes with grave concern recent events in the United Kingdom, where legal demonstrations have turned into police interrogations of the demonstrators and the organizers, and where those opposing the rally using violence were not arrested, let alone detained, because police deemed an arrest “unsafe” in a hostile environment.

The English Defence League (EDL) held a peaceful outdoor meeting in Walthamstow on September 1, 2012. The meeting had been negotiated between the EDL and police liaison officers well in advance, and it was a legal one.

Hundreds of supporters traveled from all over the country to hear EDL leaders and leaders from the British Freedom Party speak at the rally. During the demonstration, the police allowed a growing number of Muslim and UAF (Unite Against Fascism) to assemble at a distance of only twenty feet. As their numbers grew, so did their violence. Bottles, sticks, bricks and coins came at the speakers, the faces of the protestors were contorted in hate . They then proceeded to charge the

police lines, which only just held. In answer to a question put to the senior police officer as to why the violence was allowed, the officer replied that it was “unsafe” to arrest anybody in such a hostile environment.1

In the meantime, the main EDL demonstrators, numbering about 400-500, had been kettled in a side street. The counter-protestors tried to break through the police line again, when the organizers were told that the situation had become uncontrollable and the meeting had to be canceled. The main EDL contingent was told to leave or face immediate arrest, and leave they did.

The EDL speakers were escorted out of Walthamstow in the vehicles they arrived in, but not before the UAF and its associates had photographed the license plates. Police refused to confiscate the film, despite knowing the security implications.

What transpired in Walthamstow calls for answers to the following questions:

  • Why did the police allow the EDL group to be attacked with potentially deadly bricks and bottles for over an hour?
  • Why did the police not arrest a single person carrying out these acts of violence?
  • Why did the police kettle a peaceful group of EDL supporters for hours and withhold water and toilet facilities?
  • Why did police arrest many of these supporters on false grounds and later “de-arrest” them after taking them to various parts of London?

We note that these police actions – false imprisonment and blatant disregard for upholding the law and order – are a matter of great concern.

In addition, we note that this is not the first time, and we fear that it will not be the last time that the right to peaceful assembly was trampled by lack of proper police protection. It is the nature of a functioning democracy to allow dissenting opinions. Whether or not one agrees with the EDL’s views, it is the democratic state’s duty – in line with its OSCE commitments – to protect those demonstrating peacefully.

It now appears that the democratic right to freedom of assembly is only applicable to some members and groups. It appears that dissenting opinions are no longer tolerated in the United Kingdom. Dissenting opinions are crushed by force, intimidation, and inconvenience.

This is indeed a very worrisome trend.


Recalling and reinforcing BPE’s statement made at HDIM in 2009 in this regard and remind participating States that [they] “… are accountable to their citizens and responsible to each other for their implementation of their OSCE commitments”, BPE thus

– calls on the OSCE participating States to ensure that OSCE guidelines to freedom of assembly as well as its human dimension commitments are followed and implemented by governments in all instances of legal assemblies, thereby ensuring the continued legal right to the very freedoms that should be inherent in liberal democracies.

– Recommends that ODIHR reaffirm the right to peaceful assembly for everyone regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with the views of the demonstrators.



Leave a Comment

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.